Please report new issues athttps://github.com/DOCGroup
Static DAnCE used to work for CIAO x.5.5 but doesn't work anymore in CIAO x.6.0, to prevent something like this from occuring again in the future, we might want to add some form of a regression test to the score board. THanks, Abdul
Hi folks - A bit of bad news - it would appear the lack of an automated regression test for the static dance stuff has caused it to break somewhere between x.5.5 and x.6.0. I am tracking the problems now - I am not sure of the extent of the breakage, I will be tracking the problem tonight and will kepp yall up to date on my progress. Needless to say, once I get it fixed I will port the changes forward to x.6.1 and add tests for all extant examples. Thanks, /-Will
Will, Indeed. I've been trying to track it down for the last hour or so. Actually, I had contributed $CIAO_ROOT/examples/Null_Component, which doesn't seem to work anymore :( It should be possible to add this to autobuild. Johnny and I worked on adding a static CIAO build under MSVC, so perhaps we can add that test to it. Thanks, Abdul
Hi Abdul - The attached patch will allow the Hello example to deploy, but it is probably not the Right Thing To Do for the long term. Longer term solution would be to re-architect some of the RT-CCM stuff that Nanbor has added so we can take advantage of it in static deployments, which is not currently possible given how the static dance bits are implemented. That will probably require a bit more time than we have for the current demo, however. Thanks, /-Will
Hi Will, We've been aware that RT-CCM stuff doesn't work for Static DAnCE for a while now. We opened a ticket for this (Bugzilla 2736): http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/0 Even it is not the "right thing to do" [TM] for the long term, would it be possible to commit the short term fix for Static DAnCE and add note to the bugzilla entry above (or start a new one)? That would at least enable us at LM to continue our work with CIAO until a long term solution is reached (the dynamic DAnCE is not an option for us since we're working with legacy hardware that doesn't have much memory). Thanks, Abdul
> Even it is not the "right thing to do" [TM] for the long term, would it > be possible to commit the short term fix for Static DAnCE and add note > to the bugzilla entry above (or start a new one)? That would at least > enable us at LM to continue our work with CIAO until a long term > solution is reached (the dynamic DAnCE is not an option for us since > we're working with legacy hardware that doesn't have much memory). Thats my intention - I have also been able to get the BasicSP example deployed. I will get this fix in for x.6.1, as well as daily tests so it does not happen again. Thanks, /-Will
Tue Sep 18 15:13:37 UTC 2007 Abdullah Sowayan <abdullah.sowayan@lmco.com> * DAnCE/NodeApplication/NodeApp_Configurator.cpp: StaticDAnCE applications stopped working since the introduction of this file. This change fixes the problem. For details look into Bugzilla 3073. Thanks to William R. Otte for providing the patch.
We'll keep this ticket open until we add some regression test to make sure that StaticDAnCE doesn't break again.