Bug 137 - Support IIOP 1.2 in the ORB
Summary: Support IIOP 1.2 in the ORB
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: TAO
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ORB (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All All
: P2 enhancement
Assignee: Nanbor Wang
URL:
Depends on: 865
Blocks: 51 256
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 1999-07-26 17:53 CDT by Ossama Othman
Modified: 2002-08-10 21:31 CDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ossama Othman 1999-07-26 17:53:03 CDT 
Support IIOP 1.2 in the ORB
Comment 1 Carlos O'Ryan 1999-08-03 12:08:59 CDT 
This is a valid enhacement request, i'm marking it as accepted but their
implementation is deferred
Comment 2 Carlos O'Ryan 1999-08-06 23:27:59 CDT 
I guess this is mine, but i won't this one alone.
Comment 3 Carlos O'Ryan 1999-08-11 11:00:59 CDT 
Simply accepting the bugs.
Comment 4 Carlos O'Ryan 2000-01-16 19:02:59 CST 
Bala has taken the lead in this project, i'll just be supporting and consulting
for him.
Comment 5 Nanbor Wang 2000-01-24 10:29:59 CST 
I am accepting it
Comment 6 Nanbor Wang 2000-01-24 13:24:59 CST 
I am accepting the bug. I think I made a mistake the last time when I tried to
accept the bug.
Comment 7 Nanbor Wang 2000-01-24 13:25:59 CST 
I have cleared the resolution of fixed
Comment 8 Nanbor Wang 2000-05-01 11:04:59 CDT 
Some of the exceptions that are returned by the server cannot be handled in
a Endpoint_per_priority case.   Need to fix once the RT Corba stuff addresses
this
properly.

Otherwise this should be ready for use.
Comment 9 Nanbor Wang 2001-01-18 17:08:29 CST 
We need to still fix wstring  alignment for GIOP1.2. We now align it based on
GIOP 1.1 spec. We also need to fix nested upcalls with TP reactors with BiDir
GIOP.  With these two #137 can be closed.
Comment 10 crodrigu 2002-03-12 23:38:59 CST 
I think the ORB now supports GIOP 1.2.
Can this PR be closed?

If there are additional issues related to GIOP, they can be entered
as new PR's.
Comment 11 Carlos O'Ryan 2002-08-10 21:31:09 CDT 
Craig is right.  The bug is "fixed", I am sure there might be specific problems 
with IIOP1.2, but we should open new bugzilla entries for them.