Bug 259 - ORB_Core: "naked" new() operator is used instead of ACE_NEW* macros
Summary: ORB_Core: "naked" new() operator is used instead of ACE_NEW* macros
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: TAO
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ORB (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0.2
Hardware: All All
: P4 minor
Assignee: DOC Center Support List (internal)
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 1999-08-25 13:48 CDT by Ossama Othman
Modified: 2007-09-20 03:08 CDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ossama Othman 1999-08-25 13:48:11 CDT 
There are many instances in TAO that use the raw C++ new() operator instead of
the appropriate ACE_NEW macro (e.g., ACE_NEW(), ACE_NEW_RETURN(),
ACE_NEW_THROW_EX(), etc.).  TAO should be updated to use ACE_NEW* macros.

Use commands such as the following to find most of the instances:

   find . -type f -name '*.cpp' | xargs egrep -n 'return new.?|=.?new.?'

and

   find . -type f -name '*.i' | xargs egrep -n 'return new.?|=.?new.?'
Comment 1 Carlos O'Ryan 1999-08-27 10:44:59 CDT 
Ossama: since you reported the bug could you please keep track of it?
Comment 2 Ossama Othman 1999-08-27 12:12:59 CDT 
Okay, I'll handle it as soon as I'm done with the first release of the TP4
support and the scalability benchmarks.
Comment 3 Ossama Othman 1999-09-20 19:41:59 CDT 
I nailed a few but there are still *alot* left.  This is going to be ugly. :(
Comment 4 Ossama Othman 1999-11-09 11:34:59 CST 
I'm not going to have time to work on this.  Can someone else please take it?
Comment 5 Ossama Othman 1999-11-16 15:50:59 CST 
I've been asked to make tao-support accept this bug.
Comment 6 Ossama Othman 1999-11-16 16:15:59 CST 
Assigning it to Bala.
Comment 7 Nanbor Wang 1999-11-24 12:58:59 CST 
I can do it along the way
Comment 8 Ossama Othman 2001-11-14 23:08:58 CST 
Didn't Michael Kircher address this bug?
Comment 9 Nanbor Wang 2001-11-15 06:47:32 CST 
I guess he did  all of ACE. The availabilty of the following 
___________________________________________________________
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode(CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:  CORBA::_tc_ORBid = new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias
,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_objref,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_objref,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:   new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:   new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_struct,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_struct,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode(CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_except,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_alias,
Typecode_Constants.cpp:    new CORBA::TypeCode (CORBA::tk_objref,
__________________________________________________________________

is an example that it is not fixed :-)
Comment 10 Johnny Willemsen 2007-09-20 03:08:58 CDT 
to pool